Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Branch Banking and Trust Co. v. Oswald Carrerou, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-14404
Plaintiff - Appellee: BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina banking corporation, as successor-in-interest to Colonial Bank, successor by merger to Citrus and Chemical Bank
Defendant - Appellant: OSWALD P. CARREROU, individually, CRYSTAL CENTRE, LLC, A Florida limited liability company, DONALD K. STEPHENS, individually and others
BBT v. Hamilton Greens, LLC, et al
as 16-15590
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina banking corporation, successor-in-interest to Colonial Bank by Asset Acquisition from the FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank, N.A.
Defendant - Appellee: RICHARD P. BELLINGER, individually and MAUREEN DONNELLY
: CHAD LABONTE, individually, HAMILTON GREENS, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, DEVCON LIVINGSTON GREENS, LLC, a Florida limited liability company and others
BBT v. Hamilton Greens, LLC, et al
as 16-15186
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina banking corporation, successor-in-interest to Colonial Bank by Asset Acquisition from the FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank, N.A.
Defendant - Appellee: MAUREEN DONNELLY and RICHARD P. BELLINGER, Individually
: HAMILTON GREENS, LLC, a Florida limited liability company
Branch Banking and Trust Comp v. EBR Investments LLC, et al
as 15-13308
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross Appellant: BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina banking corporation, as successor-in-interest to Colonial Bank by asset acquisition from the FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank
Defendant - Appellant-Cross Appellee: STEWART DUDLEY, EBR INVESTMENTS LLC and SRD ASSURANCE CORPORATION
Branch Banking and Trust Comp v. EBR Investments LLC, et al
as 15-13309
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina banking corporation, as successor-in-interest to Colonial Bank by asset acquisition from the FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank
Defendant - Appellee: EBR INVESTMENTS LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability company, STEWART DUDLEY, individually and SRD ASSURANCE CORPORATION, a Nevada Corporation
Branch Banking and Trust Compa v. Betty Rogers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-12675
Plaintiff - Appellee: BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina banking corporation, successor in interest to Colonial Bank by asset acquisition from the FDIC as receiver for Colonial Bank
Defendant - Appellant: BETTY ROGERS, an individual
Branch Banking & Trust Company v. Barry Conner, et al
as 15-12249
Plaintiff - Appellee: BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY, successor in interest to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as receiver for Colonial Bank
Defendant - Appellant: BARRY G. CONNER, AMERICA'S HOME PLACE, INC., LUMPKIN CAMPGROUND ROAD, LLC and others
Securities and Exchange Commis v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.
as 15-12097
Plaintiff - Appellee: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellant: BRANCH BANKING & TRUST CO. SUCCESSOR TO COLONIAL BANK NA, c/o David Garbett Garbett Stiphany et al. 80 SW 8th St., Ste. 3100 Miami, FL 33130 305-536-8861 Secured Creditor
Defendant - Appellee: BURTON W. WIAND
: SERVICE
Branch Banking and Trust Compa v. Betty Rogers
as 15-10529
Plaintiff - Appellee: BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina banking corporation, successor in interest to Colonial Bank by asset acquisition from the FDIC as receiver for Colonial Bank
Defendant - Appellant: BETTY ROGERS
Branch Banking & Trust Company v. Paul Meng, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-15278
Plaintiff - Appellee: BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY, as successor-in-interest to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Colonial Bank
Defendant - Appellant: PAUL MENG, LANCE T. GAUDE, DOUGLAS R. ADAMS and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?