Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Parkman v. State of California et al
as 8:2023cv02952
Plaintiff:
Raymond Grant Parkman
Defendant:
State of California Franchise Tax Board doing business as Agent John Does 1-100 and Deputy Assistant Attorney General doing business as David A. Hubbert
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Moran et al
as 1:2023mc23754
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
Damien Moran, Crown Bullion, Inc., Bright Future Financial, LLC a Florida limited liability company doing business as Oakhurst Metals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Anthology, Inc. v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 9:2023cv81153
Plaintiff:
Anthology, Inc.
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Barajas v. 11 Auto Motors, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv22602
Plaintiff:
Rosa Barajas
Defendant:
11 Auto Motors, LLC, Westlake Services, LLC D.B.A. Westlake Financial Services and Westlake Services, LLC a California limited liability company doing business as Westlake Financial Services
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32701 Federal Odometer Act
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Integrated National Resources, Inc. et al
as 0:2023mc60989
Defendant:
Rolf Max Hirschmann, Alexandra Porter Bovee, Integrated National Resources, Inc. doing business as Weedgenics and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
HAYES MEDICAL STAFFING, LLC v. EICHELBERG et al
as 0:2023cv60748
Plaintiff:
HAYES MEDICAL STAFFING, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company
Defendant:
AMY EICHELBERG, ALLISON PATIERNO, SCOTT SIMON and others
McLane Company, Inc. et al v. Cargill, Inc. et al
as 9:2023cv80519
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, Cargill, Inc., Cargill Protein and others
Plaintiff:
McLane Company, Inc. doing business as McLane/Southwest doing business as McLane/Southeast doing business as McLane Southeast doing business as McLane/Northwest doing business as McLane/Southeast - Dothan doing business as McLane/High Plains doing bu, McLane/Mid-Atlantic, Inc. doing business as McLane/Carolina doing business as McLane Mid-Atlantic, McLane/Midwest, Inc. doing business as McLane/Cumberland doing business as McLane/Midwest doing business as McLane/Ozark and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
McLane Company, Inc. et al v. Agri Stats, Inc. et al
as 9:2023cv80217
Plaintiff:
McLane Company, Inc. doing business as McLane/Southwest doing business as McLane/Southeast doing business as McLane Southeast doing business as McLane/Northwest doing business as McLane/Southeast Dothan doing business as McLane/High Plains doing busi, McLane/Mid-Atlantic, Inc. doing business as McLane/Carolina doing business as McLane Mid-Atlantic, McLane/Midwest, Inc. doing business as McLane/Cumberland doing business as McLane/Midwest doing business as McLane/Ozark and others
Defendant:
Agri Stats, Inc., Clemens Food Group, LLC, The Clemens Family Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Flores v. California Pet Partners, LLC
as 0:2022cv62434
Plaintiff:
Mabel Flores
Defendant:
California Pet Partners, LLC and California Pet Partners, LLC doing business as DR. MARTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
XpandOrtho, Inc. et al v. Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv02703
Plaintiff:
XpandOrtho, Inc. and Exactech Inc.
Defendant:
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc., Zimmer Inc., Zimmer US, Inc. doing business as Zimmer Biomet Southern California and others
Counter Claimant:
Zimmer US, Inc. and Orthosoft ULC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
