Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Reimer v. Home Captain, Inc.
as 1:2022cv05103
Plaintiff:
Ruhi Reimer
Defendant:
Home Captain, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Pappas v. Home Captain, Inc.
as 1:2020cv04909
Defendant:
Home Captain, Inc.
Plaintiff:
George Pappas
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Banks v. Woodhull Hospital et al
as 1:2018cv06622
Defendant:
Marie Joseph, Woodhull Hospital Admistration, Lydie Rosefort and others
Plaintiff:
Marie Lourdes Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Black et al v. Pettitinato et al
as 1:2016cv03941
Defendant:
All Parole Officers, C.O. Bradley, Dr. Cooper and others
OBCC:
Otis Bantum
Plaintiff:
Theadore Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Casey's General Stores et al v. Visa et al
as 1:2016cv01604
Plaintiff:
Akron Pizza, America's Pizza Company, American General Investments and others
Defendant:
Mastercard, Mastercard International, Visa and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Franzone et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv05282
Defendant:
NYC Police Officer Frankie (Frank) Alvarez, Bruno Salon and Spa, C. Elias Enterprise Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Cavale Tonuzi Inc., Georgette Franzone, G. Lifestyle Spa Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hernandez, et al v. Greiner
as 1:2001cv02240
Respondent:
Charles Greiner
Petitioner:
Captain Jose Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruiz v. Suffolk County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2003cv03545
Defendant:
C/O #1028, County of Suffolk, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne A. Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephen et al v. Hanley et al
as 1:2003cv06226
Defendant:
Edgar Bourdon, Brill, City Of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Daryl Stephen and Sean Stephen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
