Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Sharma v. Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation et al
as 9:2020cv82414
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., Sun Pharmaceuitcal Industries, Inc., Chattem, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dian Sharma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sharma v. Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv25263
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., Sun Pharmaceuitcal Industries, Inc., Chattem, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dian Sharma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Gibson et al
as 9:2020cv82302
Defendant:
Chattem, Inc., Appco Pharma LLC, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gibson v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc et al
as 9:2020cv82303
Defendant:
Chattem, Inc., Appco Pharma LLC, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Clifton Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sharp v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTCALS, INC. et al
as 9:2020cv82299
Defendant:
Chattem, Inc., Novitium Pharma LLC, GlaxoSmithKline LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BIG BEND COMMUNITY BASED CARE INC et al v. PURDUE PHARMA LP et al
as 4:2018cv00183
Plaintiff:
BIG BEND COMMUNITY BASED CARE INC , LUTHERAN SERVICES FLORIA INC , CENTRAL FLORIDA CARES HEALTH SYSTEM INC and others
Defendant:
PURDUE PHARMA LP, PURDUE PHARMA INC, PURDUE FREDERICK CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAPTIST HOSPITAL INC et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 3:2017cv00816
Plaintiff:
BAPTIST HOSPITAL INC and JAY HOSPITAL
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, CARDINAL HEALTH, INC, AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SARLI v. MYLAN BERTEK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et al
as 8:2009cv01142
Plaintiff:
TAIMAZ SARLI
Defendant:
Mylan Bertek Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
