Cases 1 - 4 of 4
In re Novartis and Par Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2018cv04361
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Drogueria Betances, LLC, H-E-B LP, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp., and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Law Enforcement Health Benefits Inc., Turlock Irrigation District and UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund
Respondent:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Lupin Ltd., Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., OptumRX, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Caremark PHC, LLC and Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
In Re Namenda Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2015cv07488
Defendant:
Merz GmbH & Co. KGaA., Actavis, plc, Forest Laboratories LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JM Smith Corporation On behalf of itself and all others similarly situated doing business as Smith Drug Company
Interested Party:
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd.
Not Classified By Court:
AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Cardinal Health, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
RxUSA Wholesale, Inc. v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 2:2006cv03447
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc., Healthcare Distribution Management Association, McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
RxUSA Wholesale, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Altamont Phar Inc et al v. Abbott Labs et al
as 1:2002cv02121
Plaintiff:
Roth-Matteo Drug Store, Inc., Bandy Drugs, Bowman's Pharmacy South, Inc. doing business as Bowman's Southtowne Pharmacy and others
Defendant:
American Cyanamid Company, Upjohn Co., Ciba-Geigy Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
