Cases 1 - 6 of 6
BAKER et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2022cv02765
Plaintiff:
NAMIG BAKER, IRINA GORODNITSKY,, GLENN BAKER and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
CARRERA et al v. E.M.D. SALES, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01530
Plaintiff:
FAUSTINO SANCHEZ CARRERA , JESUS DAVID MURO and GERVACIO MAGDALENO
Defendant:
E.M.D. SALES, INC. , ELDA M. DEVARIE and E&R SALES AND MARKETING SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
NEW ORLEANS WORKERS' CENTER FOR RACIAL JUSTICE et al v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
as 1:2015cv00431
Plaintiff:
NEW ORLEANS WORKERS' CENTER FOR RACIAL JUSTICE , SANTOS ALVARADO , MARIA AMAYA and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
William Boykin, et al v. Adrian Fenty, et al
as 13-7159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Boykin, Homeless person living on the streets of the District of Columbia
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Lamont Caldwell, Homeless person living on the streets of the District of Columbia, Paul Cole, Homeless person living on the streets of the District of Columbia, Thomas Griffin, Homeless person living on the streets of the District of Columbia and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Adrian Fenty, In his Individual and Official Capacities and Vincent C. Gray
Hwang, Geum Joo, et al v. Japan
as 01-7169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Geum Joo Hwang, Yuan Zhulin, Lola Tomasa Salinog and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Japan, Minister Yohei Kono, Minister of Foreign Affairs
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Washington Coalition for Comfort Women Issues, Inc., New York Coalition on Comfort Women Issues, Kelly Askin, Professor and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
