Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Greenpeace, Inc., et al v. Earl Stewart, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-35945
Plaintiff - Appellant: GREENPEACE, INC. and CASCADIA WILDLANDS PROJECT
Defendant - Appellee: EARL STEWART, Tongass National Forest Supervisor, BETH PENDLETON, Alaska Regional Forester and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture
Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Cen, et al v. Rob MacWhorter, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-35453
Plaintiff - Appellant: KLAMATH-SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER, CASCADIA WILDLANDS PROJECT and ROGUE RIVERKEEPER
Defendant - Appellee: ROB MACWHORTER, in his official capacity and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: WALDO MINING DISTRICT, THOMAS KITCHAR and DONALD YOUNG
Soda Mountain Wilderness Counc, et al v. United States Bureau of Land M We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-35438
Plaintiff - Appellant: SODA MOUNTAIN WILDERNESS COUNCIL, OREGON WILD, KLAMATH SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Citizens for Better Forestry, et al v. AGRI, et al
as 10-17293
Plaintiff - Appellee: CITIZENS FOR BETTER FORESTRY, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INFORMATION CENTER, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, GAIL KIMBELL, Chief, U.S. Forest Service, in her official capacity and others
Greenpeace, Inc., et al v. Forrest Cole, et al
as 10-35567
Plaintiff - Appellant: GREENPEACE, INC. and CASCADIA WILDLANDS PROJECT
Defendant - Appellee: FORREST COLE, Tongass National Forest Supervisor, BETH PENDLETON, Alaska Regional Forester and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the U.D. Department of Agriculture
Tongass Conservation Society, et al v. Forrest Cole, et al
as 10-35155
Plaintiff - Appellee: TONGASS CONSERVATION SOCIETY, SIERRA CLUB, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and others
Defendant - Appellant: FORREST COLE, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor, Tongass National Forest, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Goat Ranchers of Oregon, et al v. David Williams, et al
as 09-35541
Plaintiff - Appellant: GOAT RANCHERS OF OREGON, an unincorporated association doing business in Oregon, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, BIG WILDLIFE, an Oregon nonprofit organization and others
Defendant - Appellee: DAVID E. WILLIAMS, in his capacity as Oregon Wildlife Services State Director, Wildlife Services/USDA Animal and Plant Health and USDA ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE (APHIS)
Tongass Conservation Society, et al v. Forrest Cole, et al
as 09-35451
Plaintiff - Appellant: TONGASS CONSERVATION SOCIETY, SIERRA CLUB, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and others
Defendant - Appellee: FORREST COLE, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor, Tongass National Forest, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
League of Wilderness Defenders, et al v. John Allen, et al
as 09-35125
Plaintiff - Appellee: LEAGUE OF WILDERNESS DEFENDERS-BLUE MOUNTAINS BIODIVERSITY PROJECT, CASCADIA WILDLANDS PROJECT and SIERRA CLUB
Defendant: JOHN P. ALLEN, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor of the Deschutes National Forest and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an administrative agency of the United States Department of Agriculture
Defendant-intervenor - Appellant: INTERFOR PACIFIC, INC. and AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL
Citizens for Better Forestry, et al v. United States Department of Ag, et al
as 09-15255
Plaintiff - Appellee: CITIZENS FOR BETTER FORESTRY, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INFORMATION, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and U.S.D.A. FOREST SERVICE
Defendant-intervenor: AMERICAN FOREST & PAPER ASSOCIATION and AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?