Cases 171 - 180 of 516
Concepcion Vega v. CELEBRITY CRUISES, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv21158
Plaintiff:
Oscar Concepcion Vega
Defendant:
CELEBRITY CRUISES, INC., Royal Caribbean Cruises LTD and Royal Caribbean Cruises LTD a Liberian Corporation doing business as Celebrity Cruises, Inc. doing business as Royal Caribbean International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beame v. Celebrity Cruises Inc.
as 1:2019cv21086
Plaintiff:
Joseph Beame
Defendant:
Celebrity Cruises Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
De Maio v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc.
as 1:2019cv20640
Plaintiff:
Rosemary De Maio
Defendant:
Celebrity Cruises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
ROULEAU v. CELEBRITY CRUISES, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv20411
Defendant:
Seaspray Cruises, Ltd. and CELEBRITY CRUISES, INC.
Plaintiff:
CHERI ROULEAU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peck v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc.
as 1:2019cv20390
Plaintiff:
Allen Peck
Defendant:
CELEBRITY CRUISES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Hatzis v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc.
as 1:2019cv20202
Defendant:
Celebrity Cruises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Fotini Hatzis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blau v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc.
as 1:2019cv20173
Defendant:
Celebrity Cruises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joel Blau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Mabs et al v. CELEBRITY CRUISES, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv20144
Plaintiff:
Rick Michalson, Kenneth Mabs, Terry Mabs and others
Defendant:
Vacation & Tour Consultants (St.Kitts), Sky Safari Tours, Inc., CELEBRITY CRUISES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SOLIS et al v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc.
as 1:2018cv25409
Defendant:
Celebrity Cruises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
RICARDO SOLIS and CLAUDINE SOLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Solomon v. Celebrity Cruises Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv25371
Defendant:
Celebrity Cruises Inc., Canyon Ranch Institute and CR SpaClub at Sea, LLC
Plaintiff:
Brian Solomon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
