Cases 1 - 5 of 5
United States of America v. McMillian et al
as 8:2017cv02478
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Charles E. McMillian, Yolanda McMillian, Wells Fargo Bank N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 7403
Branch Banking and Trust Co. v. Oswald Carrerou, et al
as 17-14404
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina banking corporation, as successor-in-interest to Colonial Bank, successor by merger to Citrus and Chemical Bank
Defendant - Appellant:
OSWALD P. CARREROU, individually, CRYSTAL CENTRE, LLC, A Florida limited liability company, DONALD K. STEPHENS, individually and others
Branch Banking & Trust v. S&S Development, Inc., et al
as 14-13914
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina banking corporation, as successor-in-interest to Colonial Bank by asset acquisition from the FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank, successor by merger to Citrus and Chemical Bank
Defendant / Appellant:
S&S DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Florida corporation, BRIAN K. SWAIN, individually and DONALD K. STEPHENS, individually
Branch Banking and Trust Compa v. S&S Development, Inc., et al
as 14-12880
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina banking corporation, as successor-in-interest to Colonial Bank by asset acquisition from the FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank, successor by merger to Citrus and Chemical Bank
Defendant - Appellant:
S&S DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Florida Corporation and BRIAN K. SWAIN
Branch Banking and Trust Co. v. S&S Development, Inc., et al
as 14-12879
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina banking corporation, as successor-in-interest to Colonial Bank by asset acquisition from the FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank, successor by merger to Citrus and Chemical Bank
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD K. STEPHENS, S&S DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Florida corporation and BRIAN K. SWAIN, individually
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
