Cases 1 - 10 of 187
Ruben Santoyo v. Martha M. Pacold
as 23-3048
Petitioner:
RUBEN SANTOYO
Respondent:
MARTHA M. PACOLD
Interested Party:
CITY OF CHICAGO, KEVIN SODJA and ISAI JUNES
Ruben Santoyo v. Martha M. Pacold
as 23-2879
Petitioner:
RUBEN SANTOYO
Respondent:
MARTHA M. PACOLD
Interested Party:
CITY OF CHICAGO, KEVIN SODJA and ISAI JUNES
Lee Ann McKay v. John J. Tharp, Jr.
as 23-2072
Petitioner:
LEE ANN MCKAY
Respondent:
JOHN J. THARP, JR.
Interested Party:
CITY OF CHICAGO
James Garner v. Thomas Costello, et al
as 23-1519
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES H. GARNER
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS COSTELLO, CITY OF CHICAGO, PHILIP COCOMISE and others
James Garner v. Thomas Costello, et al
as 23-1374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES H. GARNER
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS COSTELLO, CITY OF CHICAGO, PHILIP COCOMISE and others
James Garner v. Steven Kidd, et al
as 23-1194
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES H. GARNER
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS COSTELLO, CITY OF CHICAGO, STEVEN KIDD and others
James Garner v. Steven Kidd, et al
as 23-1006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES H. GARNER
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVEN KIDD, THOMAS COSTELLO, CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Protect Our Parks, Inc., et al v. Pete Buttigieg, et al
as 22-3190
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PROTECT OUR PARKS, INC., SID E. WILLIAMS, BREN A. SHERIFF and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PETE BUTTIGIEG, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Transportation, STEPHANIE POLLACK, Acting Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration, ARLENE KOCHER, Division Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration, Illinois Division and others
James Garner v. City of Chicago
as 22-2461
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES H. GARNER
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO
Felipe Gomez v. City of Chicago, et al
as 22-1352
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FELIPE N. GOMEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, LORI LIGHTFOOT, as Mayor, and personally, STATE OF TEXAS, Interpleader defendant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
