Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Marvin Faulkner v. Anna Loftus, et al
as 18-2531
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN FAULKNER
Defendant - Appellee:
ANNA M. LOFTUS, PIERCE AND ASSOCIATES, FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION and others
Marvin Faulkner v. Anna Loftus, et al
as 17-2266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN FAULKNER
Defendant - Appellee:
ANNA M. LOFTUS, PIERCE AND ASSOCIATES, FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION and others
Faulkner v. Gomez et al
as 1:2017cv04286
Plaintiff:
Marvin Faulkner
Defendant:
Bryan Gomez, Anna M. Loftus, Pierce & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Veal v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv11151
Plaintiff:
Tonnia Annitha Veal
Defendant:
City of Chicago and Rahm Emmanuel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. Murdock et al
as 1:2016cv05777
Plaintiff:
Lyonal Lewis Bey
Defendant:
Kinyana Murdock, Sophia H Hall, Chicago Housing Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Faulkner et al v. Loftus et al
as 1:2016cv02432
Plaintiff:
Marvin Faulkner and Samuel C Umunna
Defendant:
Anna M. Loftus, William Farrow, Pierce & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Garner et al v. Door & Window Guard Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv10553
Defendant:
Althea Kuller, PC Development Inc, Luis Vera and others
Plaintiff:
James Garner and Tina Turner
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Jeffery Haynes v. City of Chicago, et al
as 15-1258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFERY HAYNES
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Illinois, ED H. SMITH and MORT LEVY
Doe #1 et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv09052
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, Jane Doe #3 and others
Defendant:
United States of America , Patrick J. Fitzgerald, David Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Haynes v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2012cv02980
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Haynes
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , Ed H Smith and Mort Levy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
