Cases 41 - 50 of 103
Andrews et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv04873
Defendant:
City of Chicago Transportation Department, United States of America, United States Postal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Devaughn Webb, Jaleah Davis, Quianna Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Brooks et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2018cv02994
Plaintiff:
Regina Brooks and Virgil Lamb
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Gregory Dobbs and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Avant v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv02145
Plaintiff:
Venus Avant
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, D. Perez and H. Betancourt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sadder-Bey v. City Of Chicago
as 1:2018cv01051
Plaintiff:
Cordaro DeAndre Sadder-Bey
Defendant:
City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gant v. City of Chicago
as 1:2017cv08801
Plaintiff:
Chris Gant
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Hurston v. City of Chicago, a municipality et al
as 1:2017cv07114
Plaintiff:
Aisha Hurston
Defendant:
City of Chicago, a municipality and Darren L Easterday
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv05860
Plaintiff:
Deion L. Turner
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Department of Police and Two Unidentified CPD Criminal Registration Unit Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamell Malone v. City of Chicago, et al
as 17-1086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMELL O. MALONE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, JAMES H. CAMPBELL, Officer and VINCENT T. FOGGEY, Officer
Donaldson v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv10878
Plaintiff:
Pedro Donaldson
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Chicago Transit Authority and CTA Conductor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dixon v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv08990
Plaintiff:
Angelo Dixon
Defendant:
City Of Chicago and D.L. Cravens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
