Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Giles v. City of Chicago
as 1:2024cv01994
Plaintiff:
Steve Terrell Giles
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saldana v. Erby et al
as 1:2023cv16569
Plaintiff:
Elba SALDANA
Defendant:
Herbert Erby and BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Antoinette Sellers v. Chicago Police Department, et al
as 23-3177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTOINETTE C. SELLERS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT and CITY OF CHICAGO
Alamo v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv15434
Plaintiff:
Robert Alamo
Defendant:
City Of Chicago and Angela Spalla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Antoinette Sellers v. Chicago Police Department, et al
as 23-3178
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTOINETTE C. SELLERS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT and CITY OF CHICAGO
Sellers v. City Of Chicago
as 1:2023cv03751
Plaintiff:
Antoinette C Sellers
Defendant:
City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Smith v. The City of Chicago, et al.
as 1:2023cv03764
Plaintiff:
Tequila Smith and Coretta Van Dyke
Defendant:
The City of Chicago and Officer Precious Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jerico Cruz v. City of Chicago, et al
as 23-2123
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERICO MATIAS CRUZ
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, KENTECH CONSULTING, INC., DIEGO FLORES and others
Sellers et al v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv03661
Plaintiff:
Antoinette C Sellers, Latoya V. Neal and Derrick Clyde Sellers
Defendant:
Chicago Police Department and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Rojas v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv01241
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Montoya Rojas
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, J. P. O'Brien, M. J. Paterkiewicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
