Cases 31 - 40 of 81
Sadder-Bey v. City Of Chicago
as 1:2018cv01051
Plaintiff:
Cordaro DeAndre Sadder-Bey
Defendant:
City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gant v. City of Chicago
as 1:2017cv08801
Plaintiff:
Chris Gant
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Hurston v. City of Chicago, a municipality et al
as 1:2017cv07114
Plaintiff:
Aisha Hurston
Defendant:
City of Chicago, a municipality and Darren L Easterday
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv05860
Plaintiff:
Deion L. Turner
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Department of Police and Two Unidentified CPD Criminal Registration Unit Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donaldson v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv10878
Plaintiff:
Pedro Donaldson
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Chicago Transit Authority and CTA Conductor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dixon v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv08990
Plaintiff:
Angelo Dixon
Defendant:
City Of Chicago and D.L. Cravens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Williams v. City of Chicago, The et al
as 1:2016cv04094
Plaintiff:
Clyde Williams
Defendant:
City of Chicago, The, Com-ed Electric Company at , al and The Exelon Corporation at, al, al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone et al v. City of Chicago Police Department (Sixth District), The
as 1:2016cv03640
Plaintiff:
Jamell Malone and Monique Cox
Defendant:
City of Chicago Police Department (Sixth District), The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. The Hertz Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv02854
Plaintiff:
Jeff Davis
Defendant:
The Hertz Corporation, Chicago Department of Aviation, City Of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eliyahu-Hachitzadaqi v. Amtrak Rail et al
as 1:2016cv02118
Plaintiff:
Eliyahu-Hachitzadaqi
Defendant:
Amtrak Rail, Arnold Martinez, City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
