Cases 1 - 6 of 6
TN Gas Pipel Co v. FERC
as 03-1452
Petitioner:
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
PSEG Energy Resources & Trade LLC, Bay State Gas Company, Berkshire Gas Company and others
Proc Gas Consum, et al v. FERC
as 01-1151
Petitioner:
Process Gas Consumers Group, Bay State Gas Company, Berkshire Gas Company and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company
Intervenor For Petitioner:
East Tennessee Group
Inter Nat Gas Assn v. FERC
as 98-1333
Petitioner:
Interstate Natural Gas Association of America
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Missouri Gas Energy, Division of Southern Union Company, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America, Williams Gas Pipelines Central, Inc. and others
Terminated Party:
Essex County Gas Company, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Algonquin Gas Transmission Company, East Tennessee Natural Gas Company, Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership and others
:
Proc Gas Consum v. FERC
as 98-1075
Petitioner:
Process Gas Consumers Group
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, Bay State Gas Company, Berkshire Gas Company and others
Con Edison Co NY Inc, et al v. FERC
as 97-1554
Petitioner:
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Brooklyn Union Gas Company, Public Service Electric & Gas Company and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Northern Illinois Gas Company, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, Shell Offshore, Inc. and others
:
and
NorAm Gas Transm v. FERC
as 97-1101
Petitioner:
NorAm Gas Transmission Company
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
City of Clarksville, Tennessee, City of Springfield, Tennessee, City of Portland, Tennessee and others
:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
