Cases filed in Delaware
Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Tallman v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2013cv01828
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Tallman
Defendant: 84 Lumber Company , Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cross_claimant: Genuine Parts Company , IMO Industries Inc. , SB Decking Inc. and others
Cross_defendant: Genuine Parts Company , 84 Lumber Company , Ace Hardware Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Brandenburg et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01714
Plaintiff: Rollin Brandenburg and Elaine Brandenburg
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , American Biltrite Co. , Atwood & Morrill Company Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: American Biltrite Co. , Aurora Pump Company and Cleaver-Brooks Inc.
Cross_defendant: American Biltrite Co. , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Atwood & Morrill Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
MacQueen v. Union Carbide Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00831
Plaintiff: Marguerite MacQueen
Defendant: Union Carbide Corporation, Acme Engineering & Manufacturing , Aerco International Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: General Electric Company, IMO Industries Inc. and Hyde Windlass Company
Cross_defendant: General Electric Company , 3M Company, Acme Engineering & Manufacturing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
MacQueen v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00835
Plaintiff: Marguerite MacQueen
Defendant: Union Carbide Corporation, Acme Engineering & Manufacturing , Aerco International Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: IMO Industries Inc. and Hyde Windless Company
Cross_defendant: IMO Industries Inc. , 3M Company, Acme Engineering & Manufacturing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Patterson Mims et al v. 84 Lumber Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00298
Plaintiff: Patterson Mims and Vera Mims
Defendant: 84 Lumber Company , AO Smith Corporation, Advance Auto Parts Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: Cleaver-Brooks Inc. and Ericsson Inc.
Cross_defendant: Cleaver-Brooks Inc., 84 Lumber Company , AGCO Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Patterson Mims et al v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2012cv01227
Defendant: American Biltrite Inc., CNH America LLC, HB Smith Company Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Patterson Mims and Vera Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Blake et al v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2012cv01174
Defendant: CBS Corporation, Cleaver-Brooks Inc., Georgia Pacific LLC and others
Cross Defendant: Soco-West Inc., Trane US Inc., American Honda Motor Co. Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Barbara Blake, Rufus Blake and Michael Blake
Cross Claimant: Advance Auto Parts Inc., Boeing Co., Eaton Corporation and others
Counter Defendant: FMC Corporation, General Electric Company and Mannington Mills Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Von Dell et al v. Boeing Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00786
Plaintiff: Bonnie Von Dell and John Von Dell
Defendant: Boeing Company , 3M Company, Alcan Products Corporation and others
Pecial_master: Vincent J. Poppiti, (SM)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Bass v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00564
Plaintiff: James D. Bass, Jr.
Defendant: Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc. and others
Pecial_master: Vincent J. Poppiti, (SM)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Hagerty et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00548
Plaintiff: Earl E. Hagerty and Jo E. Hagerty
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Armstrong International Inc., Asco Valve Inc. and others
Pecial_master: Vincent J. Poppiti, (SM)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?