Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Cideko v. Unifund
as 0:2007cv60507
Plaintiff:
Clifford J. Cideko
Defendant:
Unifund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cideko v. Asset Acceptance, LLC
as 0:2007cv60488
Plaintiff:
Clifford J. Cideko
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance, LLC and Asset Acceptance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cideko v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 0:2007cv60464
Plaintiff:
Clifford J. Cideko
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC and Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cideko v. Vision Financial Corp.
as 0:2007cv60463
Plaintiff:
Clifford J. Cideko
Defendant:
Vision Financial Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cideko v. CU Recovery, Inc.
as 0:2007cv60247
Plaintiff:
Clifford J. Cideko
Defendant:
CU Recovery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Anderson Tobacco Company, LLC
as 0:2007cv60234
Plaintiff:
Anderson Tobacco Company, LLC, Anderson Management Company, LLC, Martin Joe Smolick, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Clifford Shane Rolls, Clifford Shane Rolls, Shlomo Ben-Tov and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Cideko v. ER Solutions, Inc.
as 0:2007cv60213
Plaintiff:
Clifford J. Cideko
Defendant:
ER Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv10003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Scheck Investments, et al v. Viatical Benefactors, et al
as 1:2004cv21160
Plaintiff:
Scheck Investments, L.P. , Paul Pappas and Elena Parrales
Defendant:
Viatical Benefactors, LLC, Viatical Services, Inc., Kensington Management, Inc. and others
Receiver:
Roberto Martinez
Movant:
Hugo Group , Calabria Assets Ltd and Post-Closing MBC Investors
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0022
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
