Personal Injury- Product Liability Cases filed in Florida
Cases 41 - 50 of 332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10254
Plaintiff: STEVEN JOHNSON, SETH LACROIX, IVAN MAY and others
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ADAMS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10369
Plaintiff: ARLEY CLIFFORD ADAMS
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hendricks v. Boehringer Ingelheim et al
as 3:2023cv22522
Plaintiff: Clifford Hendricks
Defendant: Boehringer Ingelheim, DSM Pharmaceuticals Inc., GlaxoSmithKline (API Mfr to BI) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
EVANS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06161
Plaintiff: THOMAS CLIFFORD EVANS
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CLIFFORD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04284
Plaintiff: MARK CLIFFORD
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rossick et al v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2023cv00332
Plaintiff: Deborah M Rossick and Jacob M Goding
Defendant: Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Lakeland Regional Health Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CLIFFORD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03472
Plaintiff: NATHAN GEORGE CLIFFORD
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FREIDLINE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03032
Plaintiff: CLIFFORD W. FREIDLINE
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PARR v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02911
Plaintiff: JARED CLIFFORD PARR
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MACK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00379
Plaintiff: CLIFFORD MACK
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?