Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Nike, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv16073
Plaintiff:
Nike, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, GUOCHENXY Co., Ltd., Haikou Bengangxiao Trading Co., LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Cori et al v. Schlafly et al
as 3:2018cv00141
Plaintiff:
Anne Schlafly Cori , Eunie Smith , Cathie Adams and others
Defendant:
Andrew L Schlafly , Kathleen Sullivan , Edward R Martin, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Cori et al v. Martin, Jr. et al
as 3:2017cv00590
Plaintiff:
Anne Schlafly Cori , Eunie Smith , Cathie Adams and others
Defendant:
Edward R Martin, Jr. , John F Schlafly , Andrew L Schlafly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cori et al v. Phyllis Schlafly's American Eagles et al
as 3:2016cv00946
Plaintiff:
Anne Schlafly Cori , Eunie Smith , Cathie Adams and others
Defendant:
Phyllis Schlafly's American Eagles and Eagle Forum
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Lamb v. Mattel, Inc.
as 3:2016cv50026
Plaintiff:
Cory Lamb
Defendant:
Mattel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Monster Energy Company v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv00622
Plaintiff:
Monster Energy Company
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Xianda Lin, xianda lin 2 and others
Counter_defendant:
Cheapsnapbacks.co.uk
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
REBEL8 Inc. v. Bajie Zhu, et al.
as 1:2015cv05469
Plaintiff:
REBEL8 Inc.
Defendant:
Bajie Zhu, et al., bajie zhu, Domains by Proxy, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
National Photo Group et al v. Franklin
as 1:2013cv07359
Plaintiff:
National Photo Group
Defendant:
Cory Franklin and Benjamin A Wendell
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
