Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Garcia v. Laser Courier Inc.
as 1:2014cv21400
Plaintiff:
Jorge Luis Prieto Garcia
Defendant:
Laser Courier Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Fernandez v. Executive 2000 Courier Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv20266
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Fernandez
Defendant:
Executive 2000 Courier Systems, Inc. and Dennis Nieves
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Aguila et al v. South Florida Courier Systems, Inc. et al
as 9:2014cv80015
Plaintiff:
Teresa Aguila and Ricardo Aguila Almeida
Defendant:
South Florida Courier Systems, Inc. and Gonzalo Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Ocampo v. Laser Courier, Inc.
as 1:2013cv23831
Plaintiff:
Carlos Arturo Ocampo
Defendant:
Laser Courier, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Santacruz v. Laser Courier Inc.
as 1:2013cv23080
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Santacruz
Defendant:
Laser Courier Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Jackson v. COASTAL COURIER, INC.
as 0:2013cv61665
Defendant:
COASTAL COURIER, INC.
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jackson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lampe & Schwartze KG v. Angels Cargo & Courier, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv21498
Plaintiff:
Lampe & Schwartze KG
Defendant:
Angels Cargo & Courier, Inc. and Carico USA Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
ArrivalStar SA et al v. Q International Courier, Inc
as 1:2013cv21103
Plaintiff:
ArrivalStar SA and Melvino Technologies Limited
Defendant:
Q International Courier, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Cuello v. Laser Courier Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv24484
Plaintiff:
Saylhet Cuello
Defendant:
Laser Courier Inc. and Ali Dilmaghani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Arcila v. Logistics Parcel Network Corp. et al
as 1:2012cv20411
Plaintiff:
Alvaro G. Arcila
Defendant:
Logistics Parcel Network Corp. , Baldwin Stewart , Daniel Roque and others
Counter_claimant:
Logistics Parcel Network Corp.
Counter_defendant:
Alvaro G. Arcila
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
