Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds of Illinois et al v. D Three Construction Corporation
as 1:2010cv02402
Plaintiff:
Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds of Illinois and Michael T. Kucharski
Defendant:
D Three Construction Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. D Three Construction Corp. a/k/a D Three Corp.
as 1:2009cv06026
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund and Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Apprentice & Trainee Program Fund
Defendant:
D Three Construction Corp. a/k/a D Three Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Laborers' Pension Fund et al v. D Three Construction et al
as 1:2009cv03308
Plaintiff:
Laborers' Pension Fund, Laborers' Pension Fund, Laborers' Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
D Three Construction and Dean Marstellar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v D Three Construction Corporation
as 1:2009cv02156
Plaintiff:
Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund and Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Apprentice and Trainee Program Fund
Defendant:
D Three Construction Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Trustees of the Will County Local 174 Carpenters Pension Trust Fund et al v. D Three Construction Corp.
as 1:2007cv02028
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Will County Local 174 Carpenters Pension Trust Fund, Trustees of the Will County Local 174 Carpenters Pension Trust Fund, Trustees of the Will County Local 174 Carpenters Pension Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
D Three Construction Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
