Cases 1 - 4 of 4
United Steel, Paper. Forestry, et al v. Kelsey-Hayes Company, et al
as 16-1240
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC, RONALD D. STRAIT and DANNY O. STEVENS, for themselves and others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY, TRW AUTOMOTIVE, INC. and TRW AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
United Steel, Paper. Forestry, et al v. Kelsey-Hayes Company, et al
as 16-1240
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC, DANNY O. STEVENS, for themselves and others similarly situated and RONALD D. STRAIT
Defendant / Appellant:
TRW AUTOMOTIVE, INC., TRW AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS CORPORATION and KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY
United Steel, Paper, Forestry, et al v. Kelsey-Hayes Company, et al
as 13-1717
Amicus Curiae:
BORGWARNER DIVERSIFIED TRANSMISSION PRODUCTS, INC., WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, ERISA INDUSTRY COMMITTEE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC, DANNY O. STEVENS, for themselves and others similarly situated and RONALD D. STRAIT
Defendant / Appellant:
TRW AUTOMOTIVE, INC., TRW AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS CORPORATION and KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY
United Steel, Paper, Forestry, et al v. Kelsey-Hayes Company, et al
as 13-1717
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC, RONALD D. STRAIT and DANNY O. STEVENS, for themselves and others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY, TRW AUTOMOTIVE, INC. and TRW AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
