Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-35903
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF WYOMING and WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE
Petitioner / Appellant:
BALLARD PETROLEUM HOLDINGS LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an agency of the United States and DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary of Interior
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-35902
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF WYOMING and WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Petitioner / Appellant:
VERMILION ENERGY USA LLC
Defendant:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an agency of the United States and DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary of Interior
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-35780
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF WYOMING and WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an agency of the United States and DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary of Interior
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION, L.L.C.
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-35781
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF WYOMING and WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANSCHUTZ EXPLORATION CORPORATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an agency of the United States and DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary of Interior
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-35693
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANSCHUTZ EXPLORATION CORPORATION, Proposed Defendant-Intervenor
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF WYOMING, WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE and CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION, L.L.C.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an agency of the United States and DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary of Interior
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-35483
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF WYOMING, CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION, L.L.C. and WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an agency of the United States and DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary of Interior
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-35342
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF WYOMING and WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANSCHUTZ EXPLORATION CORPORATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an agency of the United States and DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary of Interior
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-35291
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an agency of the United States and DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary of Interior
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF WYOMING and WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-35294
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF WYOMING and WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an agency of the United States and DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary of Interior
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-35293
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF WYOMING and WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellant:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an agency of the United States and DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary of Interior
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
