Cases 21 - 30 of 34
TEPHA, INC., v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv00580
Plaintiff:
TEPHA, INC.,
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
CUMMINS-ALLISON CORPORATION v. THE HONORABLE DAVID J. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv00567
Plaintiff:
CUMMINS-ALLISON CORPORATION
Defendant:
THE HONORABLE DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183
Michael Kroll v. David Kappos, et al
as 10-5070
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael I. Kroll, Patent Attorney
Defendant - Appellee:
David J. Kappos, in his Official Capacity as Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and Harry I. Moatz, in his Official Capacity as Director of the Office of Enrollment and Discipline of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
MERCK SERONO S.A. v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv00348
Plaintiff:
MERCK SERONO S.A.
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
MARKEM-IMAJE CORPORATION v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv00269
Plaintiff:
MARKEM-IMAJE CORPORATION
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
CEPHALON, INC. v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv00235
Plaintiff:
CEPHALON, INC.
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
CEPHALON, INC. v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv00131
Plaintiff:
CEPHALON, INC.
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
TRANSTECH PHARMA, INC., v. KAPPOS
as 1:2009cv02305
Plaintiff:
TRANSTECH PHARMA, INC.,
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
TOLERX, INC. et al v. KAPPOS
as 1:2009cv02255
Plaintiff:
TOLERX, INC., ISIS INNOVATION, LTD. and CAMBRIDGE ENTERPRISES, LTD.
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
FRANCE v. KAPPOS
as 1:2009cv02256
Plaintiff:
CEPHALON FRANCE
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
