Cases 21 - 29 of 29
City of Richmond Retirement System v. Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv05317
Plaintiff:
City of Richmond Retirement System and City of Richmond Retirement System
Defendant:
Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc., Global Cash Access, Inc, Kirk Sanford and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
In Re: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Securities, Derivative & ERISA Litigation
as 1:2008md01933
Movant:
Barbara Boland, Barbara Boland, Barbara Boland and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
James Eastman, James Eastman, James Eastman and others
Plaintiff:
Life Enrichment Foundation, Life Enrichment Foundation, Life Enrichment Foundation and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Administrative Committee of the Merrill Lynch Co., Inc. 401 K Savings and Investment Plan, Administrative Committee of the Merrill Lynch Savings and Investment Plan, Carol T. Christ and others
Defendant:
Armando M. Codina, Ahmass L. Fakahany, Gregory J. Fleming and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Teachers' Retirement System of Oklahoma, v. Bernstein et al
as 2:2008cv01391
Plaintiff:
Teachers' Retirement System of Oklahoma, and Teachers' Retirement System of Oklahoma,
Defendant:
Robert Bernstein, Stephen A. Hozie, John A. Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Varga et al v. Bear Stearns Asset Management Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv03397
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Varga, William Cleghorn, Stillwater Capital Partners L.P. and others
Defendant:
Bear Stearns Asset Management Inc., The Bear Stearns Companies, Inc., Bear Stearns & Co. Inc. and others
Nominal Defendant:
Bear Stearns High-Grade Structured Credit Strategies Fund, L.P. and Bear Stearns High-Grade Structured Credit Strategies Enhanced Leverage Fund, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
In Re: American Home Mortgage Securities Litigation
as 2:2007md01898
Petitioner:
Sharon A. Jacobs, Isaac Trifonidis, Paul & Pauline Runnells and others
Plaintiff:
Elliot Greenberg, Gail Fialkov, Dana Marlin and others
Defendant:
American Home Mortgage Investment Corp., Michael Strauss, Stephen A. Hozie and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Marlin v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv03580
Plaintiff:
Dana Marlin
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Deloitte & Touche LLP, Stephen A. Hozie and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Bondi v. Grant Thornton International
as 1:2004cv09771
Defendant:
Deloitte & Touche USA LLP, Grant Thornton International, Grant Thornton International Ltd and others
Not Classified By Court:
Citibank, N.A., Buconero LLC, The McGraw-Hill Companies, SRL and others
Trustee:
Gerald K. Smith
Counter Claimant:
Grant Thornton LLP
Plaintiff:
Dr. Enrico Bondi
Interested Party:
Parmalat Brasil S/A
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Dianthis S.p.A and codacons
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
The Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System et al v. Deloitte & Touche LLP
as 2:2004cv00621
Plaintiff:
The Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System, The Louisiana Sheriff's Pension & Relief Fund and City of Miami General Employees' & Sanitation Employees' Retirement Trust
Defendant:
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Intervenor:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
In Re: Actrade Financial v. , et al
as 2:2002cv01263
Plaintiff:
Richard Bowe Roth-IRA , Jerome Shapiro and Zakary Selbert
Defendant:
Actrade Financial Technologies, Ltd. , Amos Aharoni , Alexander C. Stonkus and others
Movant:
Kirk A. Miller , John W. Barickman , Kenneth Qi Ge and others
Consolidated_plaintiff:
Stanley Sved, Ira Arline Berstein, Andrea G. Moore and others
Consolidated_defendant:
Joseph P. D'Alessandris
Counter_defendant:
Actrade Liquidation Trust , Kenneth Qi Ge , Peter Lupo and others
Counter_claimant:
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
