Cases 1 - 7 of 7
JENKINS v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
GARY V. JENKINS
Defendant:
ROGER WILLIAMS, PROVIDENCE VA MEDICAL CENTER, RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv01690
Plaintiff:
AARON GREENSPAN and NO PARTY
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITES STATES ATTORNEYS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
GREENSPAN v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS et al
as 1:2023cv01816
Plaintiff:
AARON GREENSPAN
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEY'S, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
CITIMORTGAGE, INC. v. MILLER et al
as 1:2014cv00749
Plaintiff:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Defendant:
SUZANNE M. MILLER and DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
CARDINAL BANK v. ROSSI et al
as 1:2014cv00733
Plaintiff:
CARDINAL BANK
Defendant:
THOMAS J. ROSSI, TERESA ROSSI, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SMALL BUSINESS/SELF EMPLOYED AREA #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2013cv00732
Plaintiff:
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and DANIEL I. WERFEL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
GILL et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 1:2013cv00213
Plaintiff:
DAVID GILL , FRIENDS OF DAVID GILL and CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
