Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv00685
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv01841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv01622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Cabrera v. Orlando Field Office Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 6:2010cv01166
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Cabrera
Defendant:
Orlando Field Office Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Ugalde v. Secretary, Department of Homeland Security et al
as 6:2009cv01668
Plaintiff:
Pedro Ugalde
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Field Office Director, Citizenship and Immigration Services, Orlando
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ghaly v Secretary, Deparment of Homeland Security et al
as 6:2008cv00254
Plaintiff:
Samy G. Ghaly
Defendant:
Secretary Department of Homeland Security, Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Eldeeb v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 6:2007cv02000
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Eldeeb
Defendant:
Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, District Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
