Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
BUSH v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77370
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS BUSH, DOUGLAS BUSH, TRELLIE BUSH and others
Defendant: A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
KING v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77316
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS KING, DOUGLAS KING
Defendant: A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
THOMPSON v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv76970
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS THOMPSON
Defendant: A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
VEAL v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77033
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS L. VEAL
Defendant: A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
DOUGLAS v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77392
Plaintiff: BILLIE DOUGLAS, BILLIE DOUGLAS, JANET S. DOUGLAS and others
Defendant: A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
Smith v. Perry
as 4:2009cv00650
Plaintiff: Bradley Smith
Defendant: Douglas Perry
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Atlantic Circulation, Inc. et al v. Freeman et al
as 3:2008cv02309
Plaintiff: Atlantic Circulation, Inc., Daniel W. Shoemaker, III
Defendant: Eric Freeman, James Gates, Bradley Graham and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract None
PERRY v. RAPID-AMERICAN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv86723
Plaintiff: JOHN DOUGLAS PERRY, JOHN DOUGLAS PERRY
Defendant: RAPID-AMERICAN CORPORATION, THE BENDIX CORPORATION, OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?