Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 340
Charles Reinhardt v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 19-16178
Plaintiff: SCOTT DOUGLAS NORDSTROM
Petitioner: MANUEL OVANTE, Jr., PETE VAN WINKLE, RUBEN J. GARZA, Jr. and others
Petitioner / Appellant: CHARLES BRADLEY RIENHARDT
Defendant / Appellee: CHARLES L. RYAN, STACI FAY, Deputy Warden, Browning Unit, JAMES O'NEIL, Warden, ASPC Eyman
NICHOLSON, ET AL. v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00490
Defendant: TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., TMX FINANCE OF VIRGINIA, INC.
Plaintiff: ADRIAN NICHOLSON, ET AL., EUELL STANFIELD, ANGELIQUE GRAY and others
Counter Defendant: DOMINIQUE BRADLEY
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Other Contract
GOINS, ET AL v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00489
Defendant: TMX FINANCE OF VIRGINIA, INC, TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC, TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC
Plaintiff: AARON GOINS, ET AL, ELAINE T. JOHNSON, KEVIN HORTON and others
Counter Defendant: LINQUEL ROUNDS, WILLIE BRADFILED
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Other Contract
Arkels et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11308
Plaintiff: Bradley Luckhart, Bobby Bolden, Mason Morris and others
Defendant: General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Korey Aarstad, et al v. BNSF Railway Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-35305
Plaintiff / Appellee: SCOTT A. ALBERT, JOEL B. HEFTY, KENNETH L. DRAKE and others
Defendant / Appellant: BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, JOHN SWING
Liviz v. Baker, et al
as 19-1224
Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL L. PARSON, Governor, DAVID IGE, Governor, JAY ROBERT PRITZKER, Governor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ILYA LIVIZ, SR.
LAFIURA et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv00464
Defendant: OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD
Plaintiff: CHARNA FERRERA LAFIURA, VIRGINIA WARD, CASANDRA KERBY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Common Cause v. David Lewis
as 19-1094
Defendant: JOHN LEWIS, Member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement, JOSHUA MALCOLM, Vice-Chair of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement, KEN RAYMOND, Secretary of the North Carolina Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement and others
Defendant / Appellee: PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE NORTH CAROLINA SENATE PHILIP E. BERGER, SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE TIMOTHY K. MOORE, THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: STEPHEN DOUGLAS MCGRIGOR, JACKSON THOMAS DUNN, JR., REBECCA JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff: MARY ANN PEDEN-COVIELLO
Amicus Curiae: REGINALD REID
Common Cause v. David Lewis We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1091
Plaintiff / Appellee: JOHN MARK TURNER, NORTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY, WILLIAM SERVICE and others
Defendant: JOSHUA MALCOLM, Vice-Chair of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement, KEN RAYMOND, Secretary of the North Carolina Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement, ROBERT CORDLE, Member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement and others
Defendant / Appellant: SENATOR RALPH E, HISE, JR., in his official capacity as Chairman of the Senate Committee on Redistricting, REPRESENTATIVE DAVID R. LEWIS, in his official capacity as Senior Chairman of the House Select Committee on Redistricting, PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE NORTH CAROLINA SENATE PHILIP E. BERGER and others
Plaintiff: MARY ANN PEDEN-COVIELLO
Amicus Curiae: REGINALD REID
In re: Kermit Alexander, et al v. USDC-CASF
as 19-70232
Undetermined: KEVIN COOPER, KERMIT ALEXANDER, RAYNARD PAUL CUMMINGS and others
Other: BRADLEY WINCHELL, In re: KERMIT ALEXANDER
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?