Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Rowe v. City of Santa Rosa
as 1:2011cv00311
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rowe
Defendant:
City of Santa Rosa
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00798
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rowe v. Focus Receivables Management, LLC
as 1:2009cv00735
Defendant:
Focus Receivables Management, LLC
Plaintiff:
Philip Daniel Rowe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
McInturff et al. v. Redline Recovery Services, LLC
as 1:2009cv00676
Defendant:
Redline Recovery Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Daniel McInturff and Elaine McInturff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
McInturff et al v. Central Portfolio Control, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00504
Plaintiff:
Daniel McInturff and Elaine McInturff
Defendant:
Central Portfolio Control, Inc., Central Portfolio Control, Inc. and Central Portfolio Control, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Woodruff et al
as 1:2009cv00449
Plaintiff:
Alan P. Woodruff, Daniel Fenton, Libertarian Party of New Mexico and others
Defendant:
Mary Herrera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sosa v. Asset & Capital Management Group
as 1:2009cv00336
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sosa
Defendant:
Asset & Capital Management Group
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00215
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Vash v. American RV Centers LLC et al
as 1:2008cv00969
Plaintiff:
Daniel Vash
Defendant:
American RV Centers LLC, Camping World RV Sales, American RV & Marine and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
