Cases 1 - 10 of 17
SOUMAHORO v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2016cv01289
Plaintiff:
SOULEYMANE SOUMAHORO
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON , LEON RODRIGUEZ and DAVID L. ROARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JIA v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2015cv01648
Plaintiff:
LIJUN JIA
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, DAVID L. ROARK, JOHN F. KERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01914
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
ADAM v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2010cv01691
Plaintiff:
AMMAR ELSIR ADAM
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JANET NAPOLITANO and DAVID L. ROARK
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
SPRL, INC. v. AYTES et al
as 1:2010cv00888
Plaintiff:
SPRL, INC.
Defendant:
MICHAEL AYTES and DAVID L. ROARK
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
SIDIK et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2010cv00503
Plaintiff:
GHAYRET SIDIK , A.G. SIDIK and J.G. SIDIK
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JANET NAPOLITANO, ROBERT S. MUELLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
RAVULAPALLI v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 1:2010cv00447
Plaintiff:
AJAY NAIDU RAVULAPALLI and LAKSHMI ALEKHYA RAVULAPALLI
Defendant:
JANET NAPOLITANO , ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and DAVID L. ROARK
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
MOHAMMAD v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 1:2009cv01783
Plaintiff:
KHALID SAID MOHAMMAD
Defendant:
JANET NAPOLITANO, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and DAVID L. ROARK
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
SAIED et al v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 1:2009cv01689
Plaintiff:
JALAL AZIZ SAIED and MOUZHDEH HASSANPOUR
Defendant:
JANET A. NAPOLITANO, ALEJANDRO ALI MAYORCAS, DONALD NEUFELD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
