Cases 1 - 10 of 26
O'Dell v. Quotient Technology Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06464
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang, Nathan Smith and Ephraim Wieder
Defendant:
Quotient Technology Inc., Kimberly Anstett, Jody Gessow and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Andrew Gessow
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Wang v. Quotient Technology Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06593
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Quotient Technology Inc., Kimberly Anstett, Lorraine Hariton and others
Smith v. Quotient Technology Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07068
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
Quotient Technology Inc., Matthew Krepsik, Kimberly Anstett and others
Wieder v. Quotient Technology Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07406
Plaintiff:
Ephraim Wieder
Defendant:
Quotient Technology Inc., Matthew Krepsik, Robert McDonald and others
Oppenheimer v. Workville, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv04834
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer
Defendant:
DOES 1-10 and Workville, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Oppenheimer v. City Island Chamber of Commerce Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04364
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer
Defendant:
City Island Chamber of Commerce Inc. and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Oppenheimer et al v. Crain Communications, Inc.
as 1:2018cv10014
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer and Performance Impressions LLC
Defendant:
Crain Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Oppenheimer et al v. Vertical Systems Analysis Inc.
as 1:2018cv05330
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer and Performance Impressions LLC
Defendant:
Vertical Systems Analysis Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
David Oppenheimer & Co. v. Helene S et al
as 1:2016cv09032
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer & Co.
Defendant:
Helene S, MSC Federica, MSC Carole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1291
David Oppenheimer & Co. v. NYK Floresta et al
as 1:2014cv05418
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer & Co.
Defendant:
NYK Line Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
