Cases 11 - 20 of 34
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv10230
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROGERS v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv00117
Plaintiff:
AARON DAVID ROGERS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv60700
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv92205
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv59993
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TORGERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv34060
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROGER TORGERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv30274
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID ROGERS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv19496
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv02407
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv01328
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
