Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Ulery v. Happy Panda, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02786
Plaintiff:
David Ulery
Defendant:
Happy Panda, Inc. and Robert Selfors
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ulery v. Maverick Leads, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv02771
Plaintiff:
DAVID ULERY
Defendant:
Maverick Leads LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ulery et al v. Alpha Lab Services
as 1:2023cv03832
Plaintiff:
David Ulery and Richard Henderson
Defendant:
Alpha Lab Services
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ulery v. Optima Solutions, LLC
as 1:2023cv01000
Plaintiff:
David Ulery
Defendant:
Optima Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ulery v. Insurance Supermarket, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00490
Plaintiff:
David Ulery
Defendant:
Insurance Supermarket, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ulery v. Market My Business Today Inc.
as 1:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
David Ulery
Defendant:
Market My Business Today Inc.
Ulery v. Global Personals, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03253
Plaintiff:
David Ulery
Defendant:
Global Personals, LLC doing business as SexyFans and Sexy Fans, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ulery v. Black CEO, LLC
as 1:2022cv02709
Plaintiff:
David Ulery
Defendant:
Black CEO, LLC doing business as SuccessFest
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ulery v. Morning Financial LLC
as 1:2022cv02617
Plaintiff:
David Ulery
Defendant:
Morning Financial LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ulery v. Morning Financial LLC
as 0:2022cv61745
Plaintiff:
David Ulery
Defendant:
Morning Financial LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
