Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Deere & Company v. Martin et al
as 1:2021cv00690
Plaintiff:
Deere & Company
Defendant:
CURTIS MARTIN, BENNETT MACHINE & FABRICATING, INC. and CHARLES MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deere & Company v. XAPT Corporation
as 4:2019cv04210
Counter Defendant:
Deere & Company
Defendant:
XAPT Corporation, XAPT Solutions PTY LTD, XAPT KFT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
United States of America v. Deere & Company et al
as 1:2016cv10893
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Deere & Company , Precision Planting LLC, Monsanto Company and others
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431
Deere & Company v. Hansotia
as 4:2013cv04060
Plaintiff:
Deere & Company
Defendant:
Eric Hansotia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Deere & Company v. Saba Software, Inc.
as 4:2012cv04105
Plaintiff:
Deere & Company
Defendant:
Saba Software, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Thielenhaus Microfinish Corporation v. Deere & Company
as 1:2011cv07179
Plaintiff:
Thielenhaus Microfinish Corporation
Defendant:
Deere & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deutsche Bank Trust Company, et al v. Ohlson Enterprises, et al.
as 1:2011cv03754
Defendant:
Draper & Kramer, Nuveen Equity Index Fund, Ohlson Enterprises and others
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Wilmington Trust Company and Law Debenture Trust Company of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Deere & Company v Hurley
as 4:2009cv04076
Plaintiff:
Deere & Company, Deere & Company, Deere & Company and others
Defendant:
Bill T Hurley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
John Deere Company, et al v. Ohio Gear, et al
as 4:2002cv04011
Plaintiff:
John Deere Company and Funk Manufacturing Company
Defendant:
Ohio Gear and Regal-Beloit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
