Cases 41 - 50 of 75
Gordon et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2012cv05004
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Gordon , Russell Meyers , Mary Negangard and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Premier Orthopaedic Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Schramm v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv04953
Plaintiff:
Thomas Schramm
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Innotek Medical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cosat v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv04781
Plaintiff:
Clifford Cosat
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rizos v. Joint Medical Products Corp. et al
as 1:2012cv04520
Plaintiff:
Adam Rizos
Defendant:
Joint Medical Products Corp. , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rojek v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 1:2012cv03256
Plaintiff:
Lucy Rojek
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Malicki et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02457
Plaintiff:
Paul Malicki and Elizabeth Malicki
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garon v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 1:2012cv01168
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Garon
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Porter v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00801
Plaintiff:
Thomas Porter
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Premier Orthopaedic Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norinsky et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 1:2011cv07821
Plaintiff:
Pamela Norinsky and Ronald Norinsky
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schaff v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 1:2011cv07514
Plaintiff:
Michael Schaff
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
