Cases 31 - 40 of 166
CHAVARRIA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv01482
Plaintiff:
DESIREE CHAVARRIA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Vitucci v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv02139
Plaintiff:
Desiree Vitucci
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MOBILITY CITY HOLDINGS, INC. v. AIMFIT 2, LLC et al
as 9:2021cv82511
Plaintiff:
MOBILITY CITY HOLDINGS, INC.
Defendant:
AIMFIT 2, LLC d/b/a STEEL TOWN MOBILITY, AIMFIT CORP., DENNIS FRANKLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Mobility City Holdings, Inc. v. Momentum TM, Inc. et al
as 9:2021cv82183
Plaintiff:
MOBILITY CITY HOLDINGS, INC.
Defendant:
MOMENTUM TM, INC. d/b/a STEP AHEAD MOBILITY, DAVID TUCHLER, ELLEN TUCHLER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv02038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv02833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CHAVARRIA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv60062
Plaintiff:
DESIREE CHAVARRIA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pepin v. Mega Shopping, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv23415
Plaintiff:
Desiree Pepin
Defendant:
Mega Shopping, LLC and CARIBE CAFE RESTAURANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
