Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Junker v. Allbirds, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01152
Plaintiff:
Kevin Junker
Defendant:
Joseph Zwillinger, Timothy Brown, Dan Levitan and others
Nominal Defendant:
Allbirds, Inc.
IN RE: ALLBIRDS, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
as 1:2023cv01092
Plaintiff:
James Park and Kevin Junker
Defendant:
Joseph Zwillinger, Neil Blumenthal, Dick Boyce and others
Nominal Defendant:
Allbirds, Inc.
Daffern et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00817
Plaintiff:
Brycen Daffern, David Dahl, Susan Dailey and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Parshall v. First BancTrust Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00218
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Defendant:
First BancTrust Corporation , Jack R. Franklin , James D. Motley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Dick v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2017cv01296
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Pfizer Inc.
Plaintiff:
Earl Dick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NM, LLC v. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00789
Plaintiff:
NM, LLC
Defendant:
Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
NM, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Daum v. Miller et al
as 1:2014cv01094
Plaintiff:
Christina Daum
Defendant:
Eugene Miller, Dick, Layfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cronos Technologies LLC v. Dick's Sporting Goods Inc.
as 1:2013cv01537
Plaintiff:
Cronos Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Dick's Sporting Goods Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
UbiComm LLC v. Dick's Sporting Goods Inc.
as 1:2013cv00874
Plaintiff:
UbiComm LLC
Defendant:
Dick's Sporting Goods Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Select Retrieval LLC v. Ann Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00812
Plaintiff:
Select Retrieval LLC
Defendant:
Amerimark Direct LLC, Ann Inc., Babyage.com Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
