Cases 1 - 10 of 24
District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. South Island Installers, Inc.
as 1:2023cv05014
Petitioner:
District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
Respondent:
South Island Installers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor: Suits by and against Labor Organizations
District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. Triangle Enterprise NYC, Inc.
as 1:2023cv04403
Petitioner:
District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
Respondent:
Triangle Enterprise NYC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor: Suits by and against Labor Organizations
District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. Prime Contractors, Inc.
as 1:2022cv07085
Petitioner:
District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
Respondent:
Prime Contractors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor: Suits by and against Labor Organizations
District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. NYC Flooring LLC
as 1:2019cv11655
Plaintiff:
District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
Defendant:
NYC Flooring LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. Infinity Management Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv10654
Respondent:
Tash Management Corp. and Infinity Management Corp.
Petitioner:
The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Tutor Perini Building Corp. v. The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
as 1:2017cv03765
Plaintiff:
Tutor Perini Building Corp.
Defendant:
The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
BD Development, LLC v. The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America AFL CIO
as 2:2016cv01073
Plaintiff:
BD Development, LLC
Defendant:
The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America AFL CIO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
BD Development, LLC v. The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL-CIO
as 1:2016cv01073
Plaintiff:
BD Development, LLC
Defendant:
The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Tishman Construction Corporation v. District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL-CIO
as 1:2015cv05217
Petitioner:
Tishman Construction Corporation
Respondent:
District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185
Cross Country Construction et al v. The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
as 1:2015cv05215
Petitioner:
Cross Country Construction , Roger & Sons Concrete, Inc. , Sorbara Construction Corp. and others
Respondent:
The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
