Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Roofers, Waterproofers & Allied Workers Local Union No. 8 Annuity Fund et al v. DNK Construction Corp et al
as 1:2022cv04863
Plaintiff:
Roofers, Waterproofers & Allied Workers Local Union No. 8 Annuity Fund, Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Summer Benefit Fund, Winter Benefit Fund, Labor Management Committee Fund, Roofing Industry Promotio and Nick Sicilliano
Defendant:
DNK Construction Corp and Argiro Nictas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Brahmbhatt v. DNK United One, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv14033
Defendant:
DNK United One, Inc. doing business as 7- ELEVEN and Dinesh Patel
Plaintiff:
Vijay Brahmbhatt
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Cardone et al v. Zerban et al
as 1:2020cv01346
Defendant:
Mohamed Zerban and Tern Water, Inc.
Plaintiff:
DNK Investments 3 LLC, Clay Street Holdings, LLC, Ryan Hicke and others
Castilla v. KNS Building Restoration, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03838
Defendant:
Dennis Doceti, KNS Building Restoration, Inc., KNS Building Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Marcos Castilla
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Local Union Number 8 of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers v. DNK Contracting Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv03066
Defendant:
DNK Contracting Corp. and Dennis Doceti
Plaintiff:
Local Union Number 8 of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1337 E.R.I.S.A.
IP Investment #9, LLC v. DNK Properties, LLC
as 1:2009cv02766
Plaintiff:
IP Investment #9, LLC
Defendant:
DNK Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Local 28 Benefit Funds et al v. DNK Contracting Corp.
as 2:2008cv00683
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Local 28 Benefit Funds, Trustees of the Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Industry Funds, Trustees of the National Energy Management Institute Committee and others
Defendant:
DNK Contracting Corp.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
