Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 77
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Wong et al
as 1:2023cv01559
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Steven Wong, M.D., Steven Wong, MD (A Sole Proprietorship), Cogo Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Konata Solomon Stallings (A Sole Proprietorship) et al
as 1:2022cv06306
Defendant: Gary Grody, Konata Solomon Stallings (A Sole Proprietorship), Konata Solomon Stallings, Psy.D and others
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Bily-Linder et al
as 1:2023cv00515
Defendant: Gary Grody, Susan Bily-Linder, North Shore South Shore Psychological Services, PLLC and others
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Soman et al
as 1:2023cv01526
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Sheila Soman, M.D., Sheila Soman MD (A Sole Proprietorship), Emil Efrem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Green Power New York LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01304
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Green Power New York LLC, Konstantinos Koutelos, M.D., Gary Grody and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Ahmad et al
as 1:2022cv06713
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Riaz Ahmad, M.D., Community Medical Care of N.Y., P.C., Comfort Care Medical PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Michael Zwirblia Psy.D. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00110
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Michael Zwirblia Psy.D. (A Sole Proprietorship), Michael Zwirblia, Stephen Danyko (A Sole Proprietorship) and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Rawlins et al
as 1:2022cv07917
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Sherrie Ann Rawlins, M.D., Sherrie Rawlins Medical P.C., Dr. Sherrie Ann Rawlins (a Sole Proprietorship) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Strobeck et al
as 2:2022cv07477
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: John Strobeck, M.D., Integrated Diagnostic Imaging & Cardiology of Staten Island, P.C., Heart Lung Associates Medical, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Karin Gepp, Ph.D. (A Sole Proprietorship) et al
as 1:2022cv02860
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Karin Gepp, Ph.D. (A Sole Proprietorship), Gepp Psychological Services, PLLC, Karin Gepp and others
Petitioner: Law Office of Eitan Dagan P.C.
Respondent: Vladislav Stoyanovsky
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?