Cases 11 - 20 of 535
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
MAHMOUD PAZOKI and NO PARTY
Not Yet Classified:
ANTONY BLINKEN, DOUGLASS BENNING, CHIP LAITINEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
VISCONTI v. BURGHARDT et al
as 1:2023cv03037
Plaintiff:
MAHA VISCONTI
Defendant:
JOSEPH BURGHARDT, JESUS BERNAL, SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WHETSTONE v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2023cv02409
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN G. WHETSTONE
Defendant:
HOWARD UNIVERSITY, HOWARD UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN, RETIREMENT PLAN COMMITTEE OF THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
