Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
BRODY v. PUBLIC STORAGE et al
as 1:2018cv01623
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD L. BRODY
Defendant:
CLINTON MARKWELL, JOSEPH D. RUSSELL, LILY Y. HUGHES and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Cornell Cornish v. USA, et al
as 13-5101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Patent & Trademark Office, John Doll and others
Grant Adams, et al v. USA, et al
as 12-5026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Grant O. Adams, Jimmy R. Anderson, Jose R. Arias and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Troy G. Avera, Jeffrey M. Bales, Michael W. Ballard and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Raymond L. LaHood, Secretary of Transportation and J. Randolph Babbitt, FAA Administrator
KROLL v. DOLL et al
as 1:2009cv01484
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL I. KROLL
Defendant:
JOHN J. DOLL and HARRY I. MOATZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
EXELIXIS, INC. v. DOLL
as 1:2009cv01431
Plaintiff:
EXELIXIS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN J. DOLL
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
DYAX CORP. v. DOLL
as 1:2009cv01434
Plaintiff:
DYAX CORP.
Defendant:
JOHN J. DOLL
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
JURIDICAL FOUNDATION THE CHEMO-SERO-THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE v. DOLL
as 1:2009cv01383
Plaintiff:
JURIDICAL FOUNDATION THE CHEMO-SERO-THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Defendant:
JOHN J. DOLL
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
X-CEPTOR THERAPEUTICS, INC. v. DOLL
as 1:2009cv01373
Plaintiff:
X-CEPTOR THERAPEUTICS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN J. DOLL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
P.N.A. CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. DOLL
as 1:2009cv01372
Plaintiff:
P.N.A. CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN J. DOLL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
