Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Clevenger et al v. United States of America
as 6:2019cv02154
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Clevenger, Donald Clevenger
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Tort Claim
Wood, et al v. City of Macon, GA, et al

as 5:2000cv00515
Plaintiff:
John E. Wood , James J. Wood , Joe Allen
and others
Defendant:
Macon, Georgia , C. Jack Ellis , Melvin Waldrop
and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Steve Draper , Wayne Avery , Chris Bartlett
and others
Consol_defendant:
Macon, Georgia , Melvin Waldrop , Ben Hubbard
and others
Objector:
NAACP
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Race)
Clevenger v. Barrow
as 1:2009cv01803
Respondent:
Donald Barrow
Petitioner:
Cory L. Clevenger
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
In Re: MDL - 1698 American General Life & Accident Insurance Co. Retiree Benefits ERISA litigation

as 3:2005md01698
Defendant:
American General Life & Accident Insurance Company, American General Life & Accident Insurance Company, American General Life & Accident Insurance Company
Consol Plaintiff:
Eleanor M. Acres, Eleanor M. Acres, Eleanor M. Acres
and others
Consol Third Party Plaintiff:
American General Life and Accident Insurance Co., American General Life and Accident Insurance Company, American General Life and Accident Insurance Company
and others
Consol Third Party Defendant:
John H. Askew, Jr., John H. Askew, Jr., John H. Askew, Jr.
and others
Consol Defendant:
Oliver H. Bunton, Jr., Aldora J. Thompson
Consol Counter Claimant:
American General Life and Accident Insurance Company
Consol Counter Defendant:
Raymond L. Addison, Raymond L. Addison
Mediator:
Terrence M. White
Counter Claimant:
American General Life & Accident Insurance Company, American General Life & Accident Insurance Company
Counter Defendant:
W.L. Boyd, W.L. Boyd, W.L. Boyd
and others
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.