Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv10626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv04714
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In_re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Daniel O'Connell, et al v. Jose Fernandez-Pol
as 10-17450
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DANIEL H. O'CONNELL, Trustee of Thomas J. O'Connell Irrevocable Trust; Trustee of Daniel H. O'Connell Irrevocable Trust, JOHN F. PATZMAN, PATZMAN FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, LLP and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE FERNANDEZ-POL, Dr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02955
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Flynn et al v. Heytow
as 1:2010cv01970
Plaintiff:
Donald F. Flynn , Kevin F. Flynn , John P. McMahon and others
Defendant:
Eugene Heytow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HARRIS, et al v. KOENIG, et al
as 1:2002cv00618
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM S. HARRIS , REGINALD E. HOWARD and PETER M. THORNTON, SR.
Defendant:
JAMES E. KOENIG , WASTE MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS, INC. , WASTE MANAGEMENT RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv05514
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv05515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03597
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.