Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Capital Power Corporation, et al v. FERC
as 23-1231
Petitioner:
Capital Power Corporation, D. E. Shaw Renewable Investments, L.L.C., EDP Renewables North America LLC and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Capital Power Corporation, et al v. FERC
as 23-1134
Petitioner:
Capital Power Corporation, D. E. Shaw Renewable Investments, L.L.C., EDP Renewables North America LLC and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA TO NON-PARTY JOURNALIST CARL PRINE
as 1:2022mc00109
In Re:
MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA TO NON-PARTY JOURNALIST CARL PRINE
Petitioner:
CARL PRINE
Respondent:
STEVEN E. SHAW
SHAW v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
as 1:2022cv01317
Plaintiff:
STEVEN E. SHAW
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Garnsey v. Shaw et. al.
as 2:2021cv00627
Defendant:
Mark J. Manoff, David E. Shaw, Philip A. Laskawy and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Garnsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Garnsey v. Shaw et al
as 1:2021cv00627
Defendant:
MARK J. MANOFF, DAVID E. SHAW, Philip A. Laskawy and others
Plaintiff:
JACK GARNSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHAW v. ESPER et al
as 1:2020cv02036
Defendant:
KENNETH BRAITHWAITE and MARK T. ESPER
Plaintiff:
STEVEN E. SHAW
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
SHAW v. MODLY et al
as 1:2020cv00410
Defendant:
THOMAS B. MODL Y, CHRISTOPHER GRADY, ROY KELLEY and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN E. SHAW
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Jeremy Pinson v. BOP, et al
as 20-15162
Defendant / Appellee:
J. ULRICH, SHU Lieutenant, USP Tucson, BARBARA BLANCKENSEE, Warden, USP Tucson, DARREN MCWHORTER, Captain, USP Tucson and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
USA v. Carlos Shaw
as 19-12921
Defendant / Appellant:
CARLOS E. SHAW
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
