Cases 61 - 70 of 110
ZUKOWSKI et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 1:2008cv01647
Plaintiff:
EVE M. ZUKOWSKI and JOHN L. LIPPMAN
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, KREMERS-URBAN CO. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
FINNEY-TATE v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2008cv01586
Plaintiff:
SUSAN TYLER FINNEY-TATE
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DEMKOWICZ et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2008cv01583
Plaintiff:
MARY DEMKOWICZ and RICHARD DEMKOWICZ
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TAYLOR et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 1:2008cv01587
Plaintiff:
JULIE ANN TAYLOR and WILLIAM CORY TAYLOR
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, DART INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HEIRIGS et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 1:2008cv01588
Plaintiff:
ANNE HEIRIGS and JAMES HEIRIGS
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC., BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SPRECHER et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 1:2008cv01590
Plaintiff:
MARY SPRECHER, PATRICK SPRECHER and KELLY SPRECHER
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC., AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DILLABER v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2008cv01581
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE M. DILLABER
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TAYLOR et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2008cv01585
Plaintiff:
MIRANDA TAYLOR and JEFFREY G. TAYLOR
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SCHULTE et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2008cv01582
Plaintiff:
ALICE M. SCHULTE and GARY P. SCHULTE
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
