Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Elouise Cobell, et al v. Ryan Zinke, et al
as 17-5125
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Elouise Pepion Cobell, Thomas Maulson, James Louis Larose and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Ryan Zinke, Secretary of the Interior, Michael Black, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Interior-Indian Affairs and Steven T. Mnuchin, Secretary of the Treasury
Intervenor - Appellant:
Mark Kester Brown
Intervenor - Appellee:
Native American Rights Fund and Osage Nation
Elouise Cobell, et al v. Ryan Zinke, et al
as 17-5111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Elouise Pepion Cobell, Thomas Maulson, James Louis Larose and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Ryan Zinke, Secretary of the Interior, Michael Black, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Interior-Indian Affairs and Steven T. Mnuchin, Secretary of the Treasury
Elouise Cobell, et al v. Sally Jewell, et al
as 14-5119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Elouise Pepion Cobell, Thomas Maulson, James Louis Larose and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Sally Jewell, Secretary of the Interior, Larry Echohawk, Assistant Secretary of the Interior-Indian Affairs and Jacob J. Lew, Secretary of the Treasury
Special Master - Appellee:
Richard A. Levie
Elouise Cobell, et al v. Kenneth Salazar
as 12-5346
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Elouise Pepion Cobell
Appellant:
Clayton P. Crowe
Defendant - Appellee:
Kenneth Lee Salazar, Secretary of the Interior
Elouise Cobell, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 11-5271
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Elouise Pepion Cobell, Thomas Maulson, James Louis Larose and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Colombe
Defendant - Appellee:
Kenneth Lee Salazar, Secretary of the Interior, Larry Echohawk, Assistant Secretary of the Interior-Indian Affairs, Timothy F. Geithner, Secretary of the Treasury and others
Elouise Cobell, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 11-5272
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Elouise Pepion Cobell, Thomas Maulson, James Louis Larose and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mary Aurelia Johns
Defendant - Appellee:
Kenneth Lee Salazar, Secretary of the Interior, Larry Echohawk, Assistant Secretary of the Interior-Indian Affairs, Timothy F. Geithner, Secretary of the Treasury and others
Elouise Cobell, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 11-5270
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Elouise Pepion Cobell, Thomas Maulson, James Louis Larose and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carol Eve Good Bear
Defendant - Appellee:
Kenneth Lee Salazar, Secretary of the Interior, Larry Echohawk, Assistant Secretary of the Interior-Indian Affairs, Timothy F. Geithner, Secretary of the Treasury and others
Elouise Cobell, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 11-5229
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Elouise Pepion Cobell, Thomas Maulson, James Louis Larose and others
Movant - Appellant:
Donnelly R. Villegas
Defendant - Appellee:
Kenneth Lee Salazar, Secretary of the Interior, Larry Echohawk, Assistant Secretary of the Interior-Indian Affairs, Timothy F. Geithner, Secretary of the Treasury and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
Ortencia Ford
Elouise Cobell, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 11-5205
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Elouise Pepion Cobell, Thomas Maulson, James Louis Larose and others
Movant - Appellant:
Kimberly Craven
Defendant - Appellee:
Kenneth Lee Salazar, Secretary of the Interior, Larry Echohawk, Assistant Secretary of the Interior-Indian Affairs, Timothy F. Geithner, Secretary of the Treasury and others
Movant - Appellee:
Harvest Institute Freedman Federation, LLC, Leatrice Tanner-Brown and William Warrior
Elouise Cobell, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 11-5158
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Elouise Pepion Cobell, Thomas Maulson, James Louis Larose and others
Movant - Appellant:
Harvest Institute Freedman Federation, LLC, Leatrice Tanner-Brown and William Warrior
Defendant - Appellee:
Kenneth Lee Salazar, Secretary of the Interior, Larry Echohawk, Assistant Secretary of the Interior-Indian Affairs, Timothy F. Geithner, Secretary of the Treasury and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
