Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hygelund v. Encore Capital Group, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00051
Plaintiff:
Karen Hygelund
Defendant:
Encore Capital Group, Inc., Midland Funding, LLC, Midland Credit Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kato v. Encore Capital Group, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00521
Plaintiff:
Frank Kato
Defendant:
Encore Capital Group, Inc. , Midland Funding, LLC , Midland Credit Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Alipio v. Encore Capital Group, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00443
Plaintiff:
Wendell Alipio
Defendant:
Encore Capital Group, Inc. , Midland Funding, LLC , Midland Credit Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Alipio v. Encore Capital Group, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00442
Plaintiff:
Wendell Alipio
Defendant:
Encore Capital Group, Inc. , Midland Funding, LLC , Midland Credit Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Carvalho v. Encore Capital Group, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00291
Plaintiff:
Stacey Carvalho
Defendant:
Encore Capital Group, Inc. , Midland Funding, LLC , Midland Credit Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Chua v. Encore Capital Group, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00297
Plaintiff:
Jaime Chua
Defendant:
Encore Capital Group, Inc. , Midland Funding, LLC , Midland Credit Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
