Cases 1 - 10 of 64
ADAMS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2019cv01772
Defendant:
ROD ROSENSTEIN, UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, ASA HUTCHINSON and others
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PEARSON et al v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 1:2015cv00617
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TOWNSEND PEARSON and ELI IVANOVA PEARSON
Defendant:
LEON RODRIGUEZ, SARAH TAYLOR, KIMBERLY J. ZANOTTI and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
LI et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2015cv00448
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JAMES B. COMEY and others
Plaintiff:
JUAN LI and PENG GAO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
APARANJI et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2015cv00409
Plaintiff:
SHRIRAMAN APARANJI and APARNA DESHPANDE
Defendant:
JEH JOHNSON, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JAMES B. COMEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BREAKFIELD v. HOLDER
as 1:2015mc00313
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD BREAKFIELD
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: Complaint
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015mc00283
Petitioner:
AARON D. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: Complaint
MISHRA et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2015cv00190
Plaintiff:
SAPNA MISHRA and ROHITH SHIVASWAMY
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., LEON RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
SHAH et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2014cv02199
Plaintiff:
MANSI SHAH and MEHUL VAIDYA
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON , ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. , JAMES B. COMEY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
ZIAD et al v. KERRY et al
as 1:2014cv02197
Plaintiff:
NATASHA GAMMOH ZIAD and ZIAD ANTON SALEH HATER
Defendant:
JOHN F. KERRY, BOND THOREN MICHELE, ALICE G. WELLS and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
CORLEY v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv02157
Plaintiff:
ROYCE CORLEY
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., PREET BHARARA, JAMES COMEY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
